Book Review | "The Book of M" by Peng Shepherd

in

“No one escaped—either because they were someone who lost their shadow, or because they were someone who loved someone who lost their shadow.”

The Book of M Review.JPG

I’m going to start this by saying - with no shame whatsoever - that I checked my shadow a millions times while reading The Book of M. I just checked it. I think I’ll be checking for the rest of my life.

You’ve been warned.

The Book of M leaves scars.

It first starts in Iran, a man in a town square loses his shadow. It’s magical, people flocking to see him dance in the streets. That is, until a few days later when they find him wandering the streets alone, lost. The shadowless lose their memories. The curse spreads around the globe and no one understands the cause. Fast forward 2 years and we find a couple living inside a resort trying to survive as the world has crumbled around them. One day, Max loses her shadow setting the pair on a cross country adventure trying to save memories and lives in the hopes of saving the world.

I still don’t know if I love or hate The Book of M. Memories being linked to shadows is a very interesting concept. We see shadow play in stories like Peter Pan, which Shepherd references in the book. But there’s a magical element here that I still don’t understand.

Which starts a great discussion on the iceberg. As a writer, you’re only supposed to show the very tip of your iceberg. There’s this whole world you build that your readers will never know - though some of it could be used as great talking points during your tour. But showing enough and then showing too much is a fine line. I prefer to air on the too much side. Don’t overload them, but if you’re asking yourself the question then maybe you should add it in. This is also where beta readers can come in and help you decide.

The Book of M airs on the side of too little. Shepherd creates a magical element with the shadowless. As people forget things, they can change reality. Not a bad idea but not well enough explained to the readers. We can’t see the rules - a very important aspect for writers with magic. You need to make sure the reader knows the rules. At some points in The Book of M, we see things change with the memory loss, but not others. Why? What are the reasons? Is Shepherd just manipulating the rules to fit what she needs? No bueno.  

“The memory means more, the more it’s worth to you—and to who you are.”

What Shepherd does master with ease is her character diversity. Do you want to have a diverse cast, then look at this book. Everything reads with ease. Nothing felt forced or overdone. Essentially, she sat down and asked, what can I make this character look like. Instead of automatically going to a white male or white woman, can you as a writer sit down and change it? Is there a specific reason or can they be something different? Done. That’s all you need to do.

And that ending. Well done to my fellow M. Night Shyamalan writer. I love when people pull a twist in the very end. Shepherd does a great job foreshadowing so you can’t be mad, but doesn’t construct a bright flashing arrow pointing to the plot.Claps all around.

As dystopias go, I think we’ve got a straightforward book here. People die, social systems are collapsed, and people scavenge to survive. There’s lots of moving around, plus fighting for conflict. All in all, I think Shepherd did a decent job. It’s just everything else that was a struggle. Her collapsing system leaves one feeling a little bonkers.

In all, I’m going to give it a 3.5 stars. If she wrote another book I’d probably pick it up. Now, I’ll be finishing the Grisha Verse. Whoop. I’m excited though a part of the ending was already spoiled. One problem of being on bookstagram and reading a popular series after everyone else. Oh well….

Happy Reading.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 83/100

Book Review | "The Butterfly Garden" by Dot Hutchison

in

“If you expect to be overlooked or forgotten, you’re always at least a little surprised when someone remembers you. You’re always outside understanding those strange creatures who actually expect people to remember and come back.”

*Warning* The Butterfly Garden is a dark story with a lot of disturbing imagery. Not meant for younger readers.

Why is humanity drawn to the dark? Why do we subject ourselves to the stories of death and torture? Does it make us feel human?

Part of me wasn’t even sure I wanted to write a review for The Butterfly Garden. The story is so dark and disturbing that I was afraid younger readers would be drawn to it. But the other side of me realized that art comes in many forms and I needed to share this piece of it.

“Some people stay broken. Some pick up the pieces and put them back together with all the sharp edges showing.”

The Butterfly Garden is about a girl captured by a man dubbed the gardener. He captures beauty as butterflies and preserves them forever in his garden. With an expiration date, the girl lives with the other butterflies, till one day hope comes and they’re all set free.

The story begins with Maya after rescue. Thank goodness… an excellent artistic choice. Because the story is so dark, it’s nice knowing there’s a happy ending, and helped me stick with it. After all the pain I’ll know everyone is ok. Some might think this detracts from the suspense, but I think there was plenty to make you turn the page. Sometimes nonlinear storylines really work in your favor.

Besides excellent writing, this book was just a combination of really good choices. It felt like Hutchinson sat down and thought about her readers. I know they say write what you want to read (I really don’t want to see inside this girl’s mind) but you also need to create a story that others can get through. Case in point, showing the readers immediately that there is a happy ending.

Another excellent choice were the two POVs. We have third person from the FBI agent’s perspective. Then, the story flips to first person when Maya tells the agents her story. This give the readers a feeling of really being interviewed. Would it have worked as all third person? I don’t think so. The story could have turned dull and lost the vibrant in your face imagery that led to the overall compelling narrative.

“Not making a choice is a choice. Neutrality is a concept, not a fact. No one actually gets to live their lives that way.”

Here is a book with amazing characterization - not the overly stylized classroom checklist version produced in One of Us is Lying. Fictional my butt, these people are real. Such fine detail into their personalities. We get hobbies, coping, ethnicities, anger management, goals, in essence an entire psych analysis. And for a wide cast of characters too. We don’t just get an in depth picture of the front runners, but each butterfly, even down to Maya’s parents. If you need a lesson in developing characters, get through this one - I personally learned a whole lot.

Timing is another important skill as a writer. Linear stories do not work for every plot. In Hutchison’s case, she was able to use the FBI interrogation to weave through a timeline hopping story. This let her pose a ton of questions to answer along the whole journey. We have Maya’s backstory, as well as everything that happens in the garden. Even when we think all the questions have been answered, Hutchison drops one more answer on the last page. Timing is key. You can’t drop a boatload of twists at the end, and you can’t give the story away from the beginning.

“You’re comparing the FBI to Hitler?”

“No, I’m engaging in a discussion about perspective and moral relativity.”

Final point, I swear, even though I think I could go on and on about this book. Stay true to your characters. Hutchison does a superb job. As a writer you may want things to be different, but characters are characters and they’re the rulers of this joint. I think if Hutchison had done things outside their scope, the story would have fallen flat. Instead, she kept them true. Another reason they read as real people. They make real people choices.

Ok that’s all for now. I really hope you give The Butterfly Garden a chance. I would love to say I’m reading something lighter after this one but…. Ugh book club read. I guess it’s my fault since I suggested the dystopian read. Anyways - 5 stars all the way. I’ll be trying to find time to squeeze in the next book in the series.

Happy Reading

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 82/100

Book Review | "One Of Us Is Lying" by Karen M. McManus

in

“Like we're some kind of hip high school murder club without a care in the world.”

Five people walk into a room for detention. Four people walk out. Which one of them did it?

With the premise of Pretty Little Liars mixed with The Breakfast Club, I was ready for a cool murder mystery mixed with a little grit and a little high school drama - you literally can’t trust the guy next to you. Untrustworthy narrator, crazy plot twists… what could be better? Maybe me not guessing the ending 10 pages in. Oh well. It’s all my fault to be honest. I can’t stop myself even if I tried.

One of Us is Lying plays out the story of ‘who done it’ when four students are murder suspects in the death of the most hated kid in school. They all plead not guilty, but can you trust the girl always controlled by her boyfriend, the girl who might be hiding a huge academic secret, the juicing athlete, or the drug dealer? Told in the voice of all four, join the wild ride of discovery.

First, I want to congratulate McManus on her characters. They are so well done, her book could be used in schools. We have back story, character arcs, developments, distinct voice, diversity, and those little traits that almost make them real people. It felt like she went through a checklist - which is probably true since this is her debut book. Ok, they aren’t meant to be perfect, and they were each amazing, I guess I just wanted a little less cookie cutter perfect.

Choosing to do four viewpoints is crazy and what a feat to tackle your first time around. I get it though. It wouldn’t have been the same story without hearing from all four. A large portion of the suspense comes from the untrustworthy narrator aspect. This leaves the reader unsure of who the real killer is. One Of Us Is Lying is a great example of listening to your story and making the decision that works. So many authors may pick multiple viewpoints - cough War Storm - for the wrong reasons and end up mudding the story. Sit back and listen to your work people.

And even though McManus picks four viewpoints, there is one POV that stands out. Not a bad thing, but something to be aware of if you decide to do the same. There is a reason you decided to give a voice to more than one character and you need to stay true to your choice. Even the great Leigh Bardugo let Kaz lead her story more than the other characters. Are great example of a perfectly even narrative would be Furyborn, a book I highly recommend reading.

“We could be surrounded by walking dead in the zombie apocalypse and she’d look for the bright side.”

Here I go reading another contemporary, and guess what… I loved it. But here is why it works - McManus puts depth into the story. What makes a book YA is its relationships. The characters will be below 18, mostly in high school, coming of age, and their love relationships will be in the exploratory stage. Chances are, the book isn’t going to be dealing with broken marriages or raising kids. Yes, there are exceptions, but YA books don’t have to be written down just because a younger generation will be reading them. So remember, keep it real and full of depth. Another great thing about contemporaries is you can put in some current issues. Mcmanus does a great job of asking some question that we can take away and contemplate. Books give readers a chance to think over what they’ve been handed before they’re forced to voice what they think.

“I guess we're almost friends now, or as friendly as you can get when you're not one hundred percent sure the other person isn't framing you for murder.”

Now all the problems. Tropes litter the book. I won’t list them… some are used as plot twists. Some tropes aren’t too bad, we can’t always hate the girl falling for the bad boy, but this entire book was built on them. Very unoriginal. I’m hoping that now the first book jitters are over, McManus can get a little more creative in her choices.

And that ending. Seriously. I don’t think I’ll be the only one guessing it way too early. It brings up a topic fitting our current events, but that’s all. Ugh….

So I’ll just be taking a half a star back for the ending and giving 4 stars. I think everything else was well done and I honestly enjoyed reading the entire thing. She’s got to earn some enjoyment stars. Enough enjoyment that I’ll be anticipating her next book coming out in January.

Public Service Announcement - There won’t be a review next week. Sorry guys. Time for a much need break. Actually, I’ll just be pounding through my own book. Until then… happy reading.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 77/100

Book Review | "To All the Boys I've Loved Before" by Jenny Han

in

“I wonder what it's like to have that much power over a boy. I don't think I'd want it; it's a lot of responsibility to hold a person's heart in your hands.”

What makes a good story? Is it the craft, the style, or the storyline? Do we read for the characters? Do we read for the thrill? Why do we keep picking up that bound stack of pages?

I ask because I’m not entirely sure why people picked up To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before.

*Warning* this is an unpopular opinion.

Using the gift of words, Lara Jean writes letters to her crushes as a way to finally put to rest the feelings fluttering inside her. She’s written them to the guy at camp, her first kiss, and even her sister’s boyfriend. What was an innocent act of catharsis turns into a sinister plot when all those letters somehow get mailed to their prospective recipients.

So what would you do?

Great concept. I clicked right away to get this guy from the library and gushed with everyone else when Netflix announced the movie. I practically bounced on the balls of my feet when I walked back, book in hand from the library hold shelf, and an afternoon free to read away. And then I turned the page.

I’m not going to knock the idea. I think it’s great and original. The problem is everything else, including the storyline.

“When someone's been gone a long time, at first you save up all the things you want to tell them. You try to keep track of everything in your head. But it's like trying to hold on to a fistful of sand: all the little bits slip out of your hands, and then you're just clutching air and grit.”

I’ll first start with the voice. As a writer, you have to stay true to your age. I understand that Han played Lara Jean as an innocent younger voice. The character stays home a lot, crafts, and reads, but in my opinion, that’s not an excuse to write your character as a twelve-year-old. And what are you saying about the rest of the world that stays home, writes and reads a lot? When the little sister is a stronger character, you’ve got something to be worried about.

Lara Jean, and this could all be an unpopular opinion, was not a likable character for me.

I won’t even start with Peter and Josh. *eye roll* Seriously… what is up with those two. I get Peter stays friends with his ex, but he reads as an entire asshole the whole time. Which really plays poorly with Lara Jean’s decision in the end.  And Josh… I’ll let him sit in the same pool as Peter. I don’t know what I would have done in his shoes but playing the hurt victim isn’t even close.

Now, let us talk about the writing style. Not my thing again. I find that most YA contemporary tends to have a lack of meaty substance. No clue as to why writers suddenly lose all sense of a good story. I know they exist because I’m listening to an amazing version right now. Going back to my topic of description, writers stop describing their character’s world. As readers, we know what an average home might look like, but what makes Lara Jean’s home so special? What images are plastered on the walls or smells drift through the rooms? I need more. More feel of the wind as the rain rolls in. Something to dive into and get lost.

In addition, the dialogue was straining. Not enough conflict to draw a reader in and make them want to know why Lara Jean isn’t going to the game. There needs to be a reason for every word uttered. It’s another chance to develop the character and allow the story to become its own creature.

“Do you know what it’s like to like someone so much you can’t stand it and know that they’ll never feel the same way?”

So you may ask…. Why did I place the next book on hold? I have no idea. *palm to face* To be honest, once you move past the letters, the story plays out overdone writing tropes. Nothing was really resolved in the end. Lara Jean never really grew, let alone the other side characters. I really liked her little sister though. And maybe I just love to torture myself. I will give To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before 3 stars.

I’m reading One of Us is Lying for book club right now. I’m curious to see where it might lead because so far I’m hooked. Keep an eye out on my instagram feed or check back here next week for a full break down.

Happy Reading

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 75/100

 

Book Review | "The Light Between Oceans" by M. L. Stedman

in

“Perhaps when it comes to it, no one is just the worst thing they ever did.”

Books are supposed to pose the hard questions. Give minds an idea to ponder. Nothing is black or white, because humans are not black or white. Books can paint a world never imagined. Sit you down in the center of it all to play a part. And then sometimes, books can paint the wort side of humanity to make you ask yourself - “Is it really wrong?”

The Light Between Oceans paints a picture of despair and hope, asking the hard question of would you do the same? I think we can’t really judge from our perspective. Time in the 1920s is not what we know. Orphaned children were not treated with even the small sliver of care they are today (and that’s saying a lot). So when you read this book, look through the eyes of those telling the story, and not your own.

A couple lives on an island, isolated and alone. Their job is to the ignite the lighthouse every evening. One day a dead man washes ashore with a crying baby. Isabel, whose already lost three births, sees the child as a sign from God, a chance to be the mother nature would never allow her to be. What harm could be done? The baby would be put in an orphanage because no mother would dare abandon their infant. But all stories have many sides and no one is free from grief.

“When it comes to their kids, parents are all just instinct and hope. And fear.”

From the first line, I was lost. Stedman paints a gentle picture of Western Australia, weaving in and out the details carefully between the lives of the characters. Her words are soft, never going for the drawn-out texture, but taking her time to feed tidbits throughout. I would say this is her biggest strength. I’m not from Australia, yet now I walk away seeing this whole new world in bright generous strokes.

Descriptions don’t need to be flashy or all at once. I’ve heard of writers taking pride in spending a whole page on describing a horse. A single horse people. But do readers want to be slowed down by such a common image? I personally do not. For such detail to be painted, there has to be something pretty darn special about this horse.

Description is proportional to time. The longer you spend writing out a picture, the slower the story will progress and you take a risk your audience will be tired of waiting to get the story rolling. Today’s readers have the gift of the internet, we don’t need to completely lay out the basics like a stream. So wait. Say it was a stream, move on and save those moments for the imagery that really matters. The differences that make your world special.

“There are times when the ocean is not the ocean - not blue, not even water, but some violent explosion of energy and danger: fierceness on a scale only gods can summon.”

Do not read this book if you don’t want to cry. Life doesn’t have happy endings and someone must always suffer. That’s the real message of the story. Not the questions asked about the baby. Not the choices made by the characters. But the real fact, that no matter what happens, someone will get their dream and someone will be left to grieve.

Stedman brought to life the pain of life. She didn’t sugar coat the delivery, or follow it up with ‘now everything worked out in the end.’ I appreciate this. I appreciate the raw life of the matter and character development. Stedman stuck with what her characters would do and never once let them change just to give the story a chance. She asked the hard questions of her characters and let them play it all out. Something very important. As writers, we can never let our own thoughts and desires take over to control the story just for what we want. If that character would go down the dark alley, even though we know what waits for her on the other side, that character must go.

Even in this story, we can see the Hero’s journey. Weird right? That something so far from fantasy would have the same elements of a classic story structure, but that’s the point - it’s a classic story structure. We have the initial journey of receiving the baby. Tom, the reluctant hero to choose the journey, and Isabel ready to jump right in. Multiple thresholds to overcome and the final Ordeal and choice before we reach the resurrection.

“Soon enough the days will close over their lives, the grass will grow over their graves, until their story is just an unvisited headstone.”

Not everything about The Light Between Oceans was great. Sometimes the characters came across wrong, instances where Stedman might have tweaked their responses slightly. The ending was a little wonky, and ultimately I think could have been left out. The extra chapter muddled the whole picture instead of letting the reader's mind ponder everything. I didn’t need to see the overall life ending choices. I would say more but that would give too much of the story away.

Essentially, I learned that American audiences need the full picture. We want to see how everything is wrapped up all with a bow. No loose ends. Other countries prefer that open-ended version where there are still questions to ponder and audiences can paint their own outcomes.

All in all, I really enjoyed the entire read. I give the book 4 stars. The writing was soft and gentle, just enough prose to feel the craft but not enough to bog down the emotions and journey of the story. I really wish there were more books by Stedman, but alas this is her only one. Till next time.

Love Kait and Happy Reading.

Reading Chlalenge: 73/100

 

Book Review | "Vicious" by V. E. Schwab

in

“You must make time for that which matters, for that which defines you: your passion, your progress, your pen. Take it up, and write your own story.”

Hello, my reading family.

Today I get to share my recent 5 star read with you guys. Not only was this book amazing, I also get to meet the beautiful V. E. Schwab in a month - which is a good thing because I need the sequel now. I feel bad for all the poor souls that had to wait five years. Yes, you read that right… It took Schwab five years to get the sequel out there. From watching her on Instagram, I don’t think the delay was due to a lack of imagination. She has so many books out, each one I can’t wait to devour.

Until then, let us start by talking about this lovely.

Jumping between the past and the present, two college friends become bitter rivals after one fateful night that landed Victor in jail. Ten years later, released or not, he’s on a mission to exact revenge. All the while, Eli, who stumbled on a scientific discovery that ended in death, has played the heroic boy next door. As we meet a ragtag group and discover the importance of life and love, we might learn that not all villains are made the same.

Vicious is the perfect blend of dark and dirty. Melding the world’s of X-Men and Batman, Schwab creates a fantastical adventure.

“I have a hacker, a half-dead dog, and a child. It’s hardly an arsenal.”

And I need more now.

My number one love about Vicious, besides how vicious it is *pun intended*, is Schwab’s attention to the little details during her descriptions. There’s a scene where she describes the ice in Victor’s glass. A tiny minute picture that grounds the reader immediately into the moment. Her details paint a glittering landscape coinciding with the characters as well. Victor felt like the villain, floating above the large city and looking down searching for his prey.

Writing stories that weave in and out between times, and Schwab doesn’t just do two times, is not something to be tackled lightly. There is a balance of releasing information that lets the reader get enough for the ride but also not jumping back and forth too much where they become lost and can never catch their breath. Schwab walks the line, really pushing the moments to the limit. But in her case, it works.

There were just a couple of times where I didn’t like it.

I will start with a caveat….. Vicious needs more than one read. The small details people. I was so caught up in the story, I’m sure I missed something. Even Victor and Eli’s relationship needs close attention. The hate between the two is more than jealousy - I think Victor’s relationship with his parents is a very huge clue. His relationship with Eli is just a carbon copy.

Anyways. Moving on.

Schwab doled out the information a little too quickly. We’re left guessing right at the beginning, that’s how she hooks you. But when a question is brought up in the present, Schwab immediately takes you to the past and provides the answer. I personally like to be left guessing a little longer. This can all be personal preference and was not a big enough problem to change my rating.

“He wanted to care, he wanted to care so badly, but there was this gap between what he felt and what he wanted to feel, a space where something important had been carved out.”

After all, this analyzing and deducing, I can’t figure out if Schwab is a plot or pantser writer. She has a story strongly built around the characters but with a great plot based ending. Also, the reason I dub her a master and one that I will study with a fury. Here is one time that I finally read a writer that is like me. Something important since I was worried readers would hate my style.

What more can I say? If you haven’t picked up a Schwab book yet, you might want to now. She has a lot of projects in the works - yay for all of us.

Now off to read A Light Between Oceans for book club - which will also be the next book I review. I’m curious to see what it’s all about. I’ve heard so many different opinions.

Happy reading my lovelies.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 70/100

 

Book Review | "Mistborn" by Brandon Sanderson

in

“How do you 'accidentally' kill a noble man in his own mansion?"

"With a knife in the chest. Or, rather, a pair of knives in the chest...”

This is that one time in life where not remembering my husband’s Amazon password is a killer because now I can’t check how much we have left in gift cards. Maybe I can just slide in purchasing the next book without him noticing…. I mean, there are so many books on my shelves. Would he even see another one?

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, he would.

Epic fantasy is a beast I’ve rarely tackled because the genre takes so much commitment. First, there is the struggle of finding just the right book. Second, each book takes a lifetime to read - though I know a lot of us prefer longer books because we get a lot for our money. And finally, third, one series goes on forever. I gave up with Wheel of Time after the fifth book.

Mistborn came highly recommended and at first, I thought there were only three books. Sadly, I was mistaken. Still, I went through with giving the genre a try. It was the least I could do after spending all that time watching Brandon Sanderson’s lectures online. If this guy is going to teach me how to be a stronger writer, I need to know what his writing looks like.

So here I went…

And it was everything I expected. Epic fantasy takes forever to set up. You might think this will lead to better character development, stronger backstory, something worth all the extra effort, but it doesn’t. I’ve seen well-done character development in 300 pages. What is up with all the length then? Could Mistborn have been condensed into a smaller story?

Yes and no. Yes, if you are looking at it solely for story and characters. The length doesn’t lend anything in those two areas. Sanderson even adds in a character well into the story that does fine with a shorter development period. Honestly, I like him more than even the protagonist, Vinn.

Epic fantasy is about one thing…. world building. Why writers and readers enjoy the genre is because they can fully immerse themselves into a fictional world. There is time to notice the little nuances: how people gain sustenance, political structure, religion, magic system, transportation, education. The list can go on for days. Writers can create a world and place readers inside to play. Slower moments are featured to showcase this realm instead of just jumping into the plot. Which does not mean that you need to write an epic fantasy to create a fictional world. J. K. Rowling did it all in the confines of middle-grade structure.

Attention to detail is what makes epic fantasy so hard. You have to build this entire iceberg while only sharing a tiny portion of it to the world. All that hard work will mostly stay locked in a vault never to be seen. So if you want to be an epic fantasy writer, know what you are getting yourself into.

After this long-winded explanation, I’ll get to my point. Mistborn took a long time to set up. A huge difference from the fast-paced YA books I’ve been reading. But, I stuck with the book knowing that this is due to genre and not writing. The world building is top notch. I can see clearly what Sanderson built but I really don’t care too much because world building isn’t something I’m too interested in - unless you’re on a spaceship. Then, taking into account character development, we have an average book in my opinion.

“...Do you stop loving someone just because they betray you? I don't think so. That's what makes the betrayal hurt so much—pain, frustration, anger... and I still loved her. I still do.”

What marks Mistborn as a good book is the well-done plot line. There are many story arcs that come together nicely at the end without too much foreshadowing - one of the hardest tricks to play as a writer. It’s this balancing act to ensure your reader knows enough to not feel betrayed in the end but not too much to give the entire story away. Towards the end, I was turning the page faster and faster. I also appreciate how Sanderson rewards the readers who pay close attention to the little things.

*hint, hint*

Though I won’t say that Sanderson is amazing in this regard, he did write a female protagonist well enough. She was like his prose, to the point without a lot of flare. Vinn was believable enough that I wasn’t stuck on her too much but without enough finesse for me to say that she’s an amazing protagonist. Many times her internal monologue came across harsh and annoying. In honesty, I would have preferred Kelsier to be the sole protagonist but alas, we can’t always have what we want.

After watching Sanderson’s lectures, I will say that this is a great example of ‘seeing through the stained glass window’. There’s no pretty prose to sweep you along. At points, the scenes were so straight to the point that you didn’t get enough grim from the story to fully immerse yourself into the world. We see the mists, they are a huge part, but did we feel the mists? We were told about the mists. My imagination did not runneth over with great description. Another fine line to walk as a writer unless you want to be that literature stain glass writer that focuses on word choice instead of story.

So if you haven’t noticed, yes I will be getting the next book. When I will read it, that is another story because my TBR list is growing out of control. I have a problem people. I don’t even know if there is time to read all the books I want in one lifetime. The hardest part is that more amazing books are coming out all the time. There are at least 6 books coming out in the next 12 months that I’m dying to read. Do you have one on your radar? Let me know in the comments below.

And before I forget…. 3.5 stars for this one.

Happy reading

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 68/100

 

Book Review | "The Art of Starving" by Sam J. Miller

in

“The strongest people aren’t the ones who are born strong. They’re the ones who know what it’s like to be weak, and have a reason to get stronger. The ones who’ve been hurt. Who’ve had things they love taken from them. The ones with something to fight for.”

Book club is a curse and a gift. It can be stressful: figuring out what book to read next, going on the whims of others, and taking wild chances. Such was the case when we sat there, three in a group, trying to keep the YA book club alive and fighting to find something interesting. One of us mentioned the Hugo Awards. And why not? So we scrolled and searched and researched till we came upon a gem that seemed weirdly placed on a list made up entirely of sci-fi books. “There has to be something sci-fi about it,” we all said. So, The Art of Starving became our wild chance.

I don’t think I would have ever glanced at this book otherwise.

And it would have been a sad day because we need more books like this in the world.

The Art of Starving centers around Matt - a boy struggling with life since his older sister decided to disappear one night. Question is, what made her leave? Matt is determined to discover the truth. First stop, the bullies that make his life a living hell. Their ringleader was the last to see his sister before she left. In his search, Matt learns that the less he eats, the more heightened his senses become making him the man he always wished to be: strong and sure. Eventually, his abilities lead to acceptance in the group making him wonder, why did his sister really leave?

I personally struggle with books based around LGBTQ characters. Most of the time the characters become unrealistic creations forced into a story because authors feel a need to fill a hole that they don’t have any clue about. Relationships become unrealistic, arc types overdone, and the natural flow of human nature, in general, is gone. After reading The Art of Starving, I finally feel that a good version can be created. All it takes is someone who understands the content - which introduces the fact that, yes, our author is gay.

Wow oh wow… he did it right. No surprising.

“I used to imagine Better was a place you could get to. A moment when I would look around and see that Everything Was Fine. But that’s not how this works. Being better isn’t a battle you fight and win. Feeling okay is a war, one that lasts your whole life, and the only way to win is to keep on fighting.”

Take note my readers. The world is clamoring for diverse reads, diverse characters, and diverse topics, but it might not be your place to deliver it. There is a trend now with authors throwing in diversity for the sake of diversity and not understanding one cent of the topic. Take Artemis for example. In my opinion, there was not one reason behind Weir making his protagonist an ethnicity that he has not a shred of idea about. So what happened….? The character and culture felt butchered and poorly created.

Now, look at Miller - a man that understand the nuances of being gay and used that to create a believable character that readers could love and stand behind. The message was honest, beautiful, and fully formed.

We don’t just need diverse reads, so don’t let the idea turn you off from writing. No matter our background, origin, or faith, we all have something to share. My point is, don’t make a character one way or throw a topic in just to check off the diverse box. Do your research, delve in deep, and then take the plunge.

Yes, Miller did a fantastic job but there is still the elephant in the room. Nothing in this book is sci-fi. Even if you go on the premise of Matt’s otherworldly ability when he starves himself, it reads as a mental delusion than sci-fi esck plot. I even want to say that’s what Miller intended. Not once does his actually ‘abilities’ feel anything other than delusions from lack of food. So, then why was this nominated for a Hugo award? The world may never know.

Everything about The Art of Starving screams award-worthy…. just maybe not the one award genre writers can be a part of.

“The greatest power comes from love, from knowing who you are and standing proudly in it.”

Miller pulls off a story of a lifetime, especially shocking since this is his debut book. On top of that, he throws in multiple topics that I think would send other writers spinning in circles. I’ve read those books - most of the time you end up with unanswered questions. Miller throws in LGBTQ relationships, coming out of the closet, ethnicity, single motherhood, job loss, eating disorders, etc. The list keeps going. But through it all, Miller stays truthful to his character and weaves each part into a heartfelt story for every age. I’m honored to have gotten to read the story and I walk away with a different idea of the world around me.

All in all… I give this story 4 stars. Well written, well crafted, and a read I beg everyone to try. I’m super excited to read Miller’s other book - which just happened to come into my radar before I even knew about The Art of Starving.

Happy readings.

Love Kait.

Reading Challenge: 65/100

 

Book Review | "How to Stop Time" by Matt Haig

in

“Whenever I see someone reading a book, especially if it is someone I don't expect, I feel civilization has become a little safer.”

Thank god this was a book club pick. If not for the need to finish the entire thing, I believe this would have been thrown out and considered a lost cause.

The story introduces Tom, a man with a long past - a very long past spanning over 400 years. Having a medical condition that slows his aging, Tom has lived many lives always running from people who view him as a freak or a devil. Flipping between the present day and his history, we begin to see how our pasts drive us, staying true to ourselves, and the importance of what it means to live.

I really don’t think it helped I picked this up after War Storm. I went from a pretty average YA written novel to one of strong lyrical prose. As Brandon Sanderson would say, “You can really see the stained glass window with this one.” But, in truth, the prose was so heavy I couldn’t see past the words to the story underneath. I stuck with it, as I was forced to, and found a heartwarming, eye-opening story underneath it all.

You just have to remove a few layers first.

So seriously, stick with this thing.

I don’t think you’ll regret it.

At least I hope not…..

“It is strange how close the past is, even when you imagine it to be so far away. Strange how it can just jump out of a sentence and hit you. Strange how every object or word can house a ghost.”

How to Stop Time is not a masterpiece of plot - a sign that Haig is probably a discovery writer. Some of the plot twists pop out of nowhere, which isn’t the worst but might leave a sour taste in your mouth. In honesty, Haig’s attempt at mystery leaves a little to be desired. What makes this book a masterpiece is his ability to throw in the hard life questions without you noticing. Multiple times I had to stop for a moment and think about what he’d just written in the most casual way. There were questions and thoughts that I think we all have but that have never been said out loud.

Haig’s superpower is his ability to weave the scenes in and out. To flow the information and bring up thoughts and philosophical quandaries without pausing. While reading, you don’t feel like your being lectured to. Instead, you feel deep inside the head of a lost wandering man who's trying to figure out his own role in a world that has destroyed him for centuries.

Which doesn’t mean that Haig’s casual name-dropping throughout the book works though. How likely are you to be in these places at just the right time to meet say, F. Scott Fitzgerald? I can believe Shakespeare and Chaplin, but the rest not so much.

Eventually, I was so deep into the story that when I turned the last page my heart sunk. I fell in love with Tom. I fell in love with Rose. And I saw the struggle of each character and their own fears. So yes, the story isn’t about plot. It’s a character-driven narrative filled with beautiful insight into the world we live in.

As you can guess, I quickly changed my rating on this story and it’s now at 4 stars. There are still some items that I would have preferred played out differently and I don’t like how long it took to get into the story. I feel many readers will end up putting this down. And that’s why I beg you to stick with it until the end.

Happy Reading

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 59/100

 

Book Review | "War Storm" by Victoria Aveyard

in

“Cal is built from his father’s dreams, and Maven from his mother’s nightmares.”

War Storm….

The ending to an epic battle of power and blood.

And a book I will not admit is part of the series.

There’s a lot to this book. Like the others, we are dropped in where the third book leaves off. Cal has just decided to go for the crown instead of Mare. And this, besides the political and war drama, is the premise of the entire book. Everything revolves around whether they will return to each other, even, I would say, the other characters.

“I walked away from his offer. From him. I was torn apart by another betrayal—Cal’s betrayal, but also mine. I love you is a promise we both made, and we both broke. It should mean I choose you above all else. I want you more. I need you always. I cannot live without you. I will do anything to keep our lives from parting. But he wouldn’t. And I won’t.”

And boy are there other characters. Aveyard decided to add everyone and the kitchen sink - which I think was the worst idea. Do not add people to pull the plot forward. Especially if you only let them have a chapter or two. The biggest disappointment was Cameron. She isn’t a POV at all in this book which proves that she was used as a plot tool in the last book. Such a disappointment. I was promised her story, and though we see a somewhat happy ending, nothing is entirely resolved.

I may disagree with everyone on the planet, but Mare stole my heart and having to waste my time on so many other characters I could care less about ruined the last two books for me. Aveyard set a promise that this was Mare’s story. She breaks this promise in the last two books. If instead, she had added additional POV from the beginning, she would have had more leeway in adding and subtracting later. Still, I stand firm that if you want to add a POV you need to add it throughout the book - not thrown in a part of the way allowing only a small glimpse into the character’s mind.

Rant is now over….

I was holding that in for the entire read.

It’s hard to say that this story was boring. A lot happens and we get a few, very obviously foreshadowed, plot twists. How else was this expected to end? Only a bloody war could be the ultimate deciding factor. The fault lies in its length. (Another reason to have stayed with one POV… ok really done now) Aveyard goes so nitty gritty into the war maneuvers and strategy, not something you will expect when starting the series. In essence, she lost the tone of her series and ended on a very low note.

Such a low note. You will see what I mean when you get there.

Sometimes, I even wonder why I picked this series up when I’m handed that to walk away with.

What I will give Aveyard an award for is her ability to stay true to Mare the entire story. Through all the books, she never lost Mare’s true character and I can see she made the hard choices. Except for the end. Ok, no spoilers. Also another round of applause for the second mountain scene. Excellent little nugget there - you’ll know it when you arrive.

All in all, I loved the first two books of this series. If I had to give an overall rating, I would go for 4 stars. Now for War Storm, we will dip down to 3 stars. I hate to do it, but she gets what’s delivered. I do look forward to whatever else she decides to write.

Happy Reading Everyone!

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 58/100

 

Book Review | "Furyborn" by Claire Legrand

in

“We all have darkness inside us, Rielle,” he said, his voice rough. “That is what it means to be human.”

Social issues are becoming the forefront of every conversation, and though I agree that these topics need to be discussed, not everyone makes decisions solely to ask the questions. I don’t know the reason why Legrand covered a few more taboo topics in her book, but I didn’t even recognize their significance because for me the inclusion of a masturbation scene seemed natural. I appreciate that she doesn’t shy away, or even that the editor let her include it, in this world where natural human instinct is no longer being kept secret. So, a long round of applause.

And really this delves right into my thoughts about Furyborn. The story is different. I struggled with explaining why… but then I look at the above comment and realize that's why. Instead of hinting, fading to black and forcing the reader to make assumptions, Legrand lays out her scenes bright and bold. Female sexuality is blatant. Homosexuality is hinted as a plot. The general idea that females can be powerful as well as physically superior. My thoughts are that this wasn’t done to make a statement. Everything was laid out because to Legrand, and many of us in the world, this is a natural mindset.

I wasn’t brought up to believe a certain way about things. Instead, my mind formed it’s own conclusion on the world. Many times my husband reminds me that the average person does not think the same way I do. For once, here was a book forged into the mindset of my own thoughts.

To be clear, for those that tend to ask authors - no, this is not a clean book, though I don’t even know what the definition of clean is.

Now to the actual synopsis. Furyborn is set millennia apart. One world, a noble with power that could be the savior in stopping the gate from falling, unleashing those sentenced to purgatory for crimes in the past. The other, a killer set to keep herself and her family alive until she must help those she kills to save her mother. And through it all, one source of control bent on revenge to a war that took power and life from them.

Throughout the book, we jump between the two protagonists.

To be honest… I almost put this book down never to return. I HATED the beginning. For a solid two days, I kept sighing loudly and grunting out each sentence. I cursed the book club for agreeing to read it. Sometimes book clubs do save the day, and because I must finish books for the meeting, I trudged on. Boy am I glad I did. After page 70 the whole thing takes a major upswing.

Legrand created a massive learning curve for her readers. She isn’t nice about it either, letting us slowly dip our toes into the water and test out our thoughts. No. We are thrown right in left to either sink or swim. Well, I sunk, but luckily a little life saver came along and pulled me to safety. There is no way someone could say that she shows her iceberg. That thing is kept firmly under wraps. Legrand slowly doles out the information piece by piece until you finally place all the puzzle pieces together and form a picture.

Clue - make sure to pay attention to the excerpts at the beginning. They hold more information than you would assume.

Overall, I loved this book. Rielle and Eliana are excellent characters. Eliana is more developed in my opinion, and I really appreciate her tone. The seemingly bad character is the one we are forced to love - though I didn’t find it hard. It poses the question of what would you do in her situation. Rielle felt repetitive in her plot. A lot of the same thoughts and action not repeated, but played out over and over. Her development lends more to personal relationships. There is a large emphasis that the story really revolves around her, which might be the reason she falls flat. The reader expects more, especially after the way she enters the story. Where the plot is going, I think that she will have a more developed role in the next book.

So much happens in this book, your suspension of belief might be a little stretched. Most authors choose to make one topic the stretch but Legrand adds in a whole system. I love her take on angels. These are not your grandmother’s angelic creatures. They are dark and sinister and just the way I like them. Some people complained that her magic system needed to be explained more, but I was fine with going along for the ride. The story doesn’t need it to be enjoyed. I did just fine though I’m also one that doesn’t require every detail of a world mapped out.

So if you want an action-packed story, with time travel, magic, angels, and love, then grab this one from the shelves. You might hate me after when you have to wait a year for the next one. I know that I hate myself. A year is too long. My overall rating is 4.5 stars and only because the ending fell flat. Plus, there was a scene that made no sense, or at least I missed how we got from point A to point B.

Happy Reading.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 55/100

 

"Beautiful Ruins" by Jess Walter Book Review

in

“At peace? Who but the insane would ever be at peace? What person who has enjoyed life could possibly think one is enough? Who could live even a day and not feel the sweet ache of regret?”

Or the sweet ache of turning the last page knowing that the story is over, and you need to go and live your real life.

Walter has a gift that I’ve seen in only a few authors. He has an ability to weave a story from a multitude of perspectives yet leave you as if you read it through the eyes of only one soul. Just breathtaking. I had to put the whole thing down and stare out the window until I felt the shock wear off and I could breathe again.

How did he do it?

Yes, I won’t say that it worked the entire time. From the start, it was really hard to tell where things were going to go. A bunch of characters are thrown in right at the beginning. We think it’s going to be from the perspective of a set few only to realize that their roles are more as background actors to the main stage. But if that wasn’t enough, we are thrown into new roles in the middle and must accept their part to be played. And to top it off, that one character, briefly mentioned now, plays a massive role though not told out as long as you would have liked.

Does this feel like a whirlwind yet, because it stays that way for the whole wild ride?

Hold on though, because when you get to the end and you see what Walter was trying - maybe sit with it for a while - the beauty of the story comes alive and you realize that you just witnessed a masterpiece.

“I think so, too. I know I felt that way. For years. It was as if I was a character in a movie and the real action was about to start at any minute. But I think some people wait forever, and only at the end of their lives do they realize that their life has happened while they were waiting for it to start.”

So at the start, we think the story is about all of these characters, but it really comes down to the two introduced from the start, Dee and Pasquale. Maybe I’m breaking my own rule of no spoilers, but I think this might help you to make it through. I don’t want you to suffer like I did sitting there and wanting more Claire but realizing that she just isn’t the one to make the real dramatic plays. Her character comes out more as background noise.

And there comes one of my biggest complaints. Why so much when the real story isn’t centered around every characters’ backstory? Do we really need to see Claire’s boyfriend drama played out, Alvis’s war wounds, or Shane’s ACT lifeline? Seeing it all done, I think the answer is yes. I feel the drift from the core components was the point. The idea of look, 50 odd years later and all of these lives are changed because of what happens, and, that in some way, we are all the same. All needing the same wakeup call.

Walter throws real life in your face. There aren’t happy endings. It’s messy and the decisions we make can’t always be easy and it just isn’t going to be a fairytale. The guy sometimes can’t get the girl but that doesn’t mean life still isn’t beautiful and fulfilling. Walter covers so many topics that at times it’s overwhelming. But that is life.

I read the reviews and they aren’t entirely the best. But, I get where people got lost. First off, the marketing department didn’t do the greatest job. It’s The Village all over again. You think you’re heading into a scary thriller only to discover there was always a way out, it’s just a sham. Beautiful Ruins goes through the same pains. Luckily, I read the genres and didn’t fall into the trap of cover and name. This is not a light summer read. This is hard, dirty, and may make you cry. That or throw the book in anger.

“His life was two lives now: the life he would have and the life he would forever wonder about.”

And, because I must always talk about craft at some point in my reviews, I’ll cover Walters stunning choice of words. I don’t know how he did it - and I think I can say something on this topic since I’ve been to the Italian coast and Rome - but each time I opened this book, I felt Italy coming back to me all over again. It was marvelous. Lifted from your seat, you’re set in the glittering waters before the Hotel of Adequate View. Turn the page and you can find yourself in the dark pillbox after a hike, sun catching the corner of a hand painted image. But, then in the next instance transported in time to the realities of current day show business.

Maybe this will make you read the book, maybe not. We all have things that touch our hearts and come at the right time in our life. I think this book was meant for me right now. I will give it 4 stars. Though I loved every moment, a few things rubbed me wrong. Walter went on a limb with some of his choices, but certain things like the book chapter and such just fell flat. If you do decide to read it, I hope you get as much out of it as I did.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 49/100

 

"Brightly Burning" by Alexa Donne Book Review

in

“Stella, you're going to have to let me in so I can kiss you again.”

Cringe.

Groan.

Put the book down and wonder why you picked it up.

Oh right… because you were the one to convince the book club to read it. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this was my fault.

Being honest, Brightly Burning isn’t the worst book to ever get published. I could start a long list. You don’t even have to look far, just see my review before this one. What this book does have are painful moments where you wonder what in heavens realm made you pick it up.

That’s because it was supposed to be a retelling of one of your favorite classics Jane Eyre. And to top it all off, it’s set in space. What could possibly go wrong?

Loss of all oxygen wrong.

Set in a future where a colony of ships orbit an abandoned Earth covered in ice. Survivors who’ve fled the doomed ice age dream that one day its surface will be habitable again. But, hundreds of years later, ships have begun to fail and everyone questions if the surface will in fact ever melt.

So then we have Stella, who I think is actually a pretty badass chick. Holding all the characteristics of the original Jane - also extremely strong-minded - she’s not only an engineer but she can kick butt in the literary realm as well. Left on a ship considered to fail next, she leaves it in hopes of a better life as a governess on a haunted ship. Is any of this ringing a bell yet? I hope so because it’s a play by play of the original minus the spaceships yadda yadda.

I will make a confession though…

I didn’t know going into the book that it was a retelling. It wasn’t until the end with a well-placed fire that I finally went “wait a minute”. Sorry if you haven’t read Jane Eyre. There’s a fire at the end.

Now we have Stella but the enjoyable parts end there. Hugo is not a believable Edward. Honestly, he’s the worse. The one-liners and immature character arc make you want to cringe. There are no redeeming qualities. Run away now.

Then we have the age limit on this book. Yes, I’m placing a limit. You should not be above a certain age when reading this. I have nothing wrong with books being written for younger audiences - in truth, we need more - but the enjoyment as an older reader is just not there. The maturity and overall conflict aren't developed properly. At one point we have Stella’s male friend, who’s clearly written as having feelings for her, running off to help her reunite with her lover. During the whole thing, I’m waiting for some declaration of love, but he does nothing. Nothing. What guy just follows along and helps the girl he likes to find her love? No one! Hence no conflict.

Also, it looks like Donne kept all the social constructs of the 1800s. We have the social decorum, male friends that are just friends, and social hierarchy. We all know how the story will eventually play out, there are no surprises, so spice it up a little and adapt it to the actual time period you are setting it in. All of this lends to the younger tone. The antagonist at one point says - and this is when they are just kissing -  that if he doesn’t leave he’ll do something he’ll regret.

*cue eye roll*

I thought for a time this was a series, which was fueled on by the way it read. The ending wrapped up way too quickly and felt rushed. Nothing special happens either. We don’t get this well thought out reunion that I felt was done in Jane Eyre.

Again this isn’t the worst book. I’m going to give it 2.5 stars because I think the premise was well done and being in space is always a winner for me. It just needed more work. Will I be reading anything else by Donne… probably not.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 47/100

 

"Artemis" Book Review by Andy Weir

in

“On a scale from one to ‘invade Russia in winter,’ how stupid is this plan?”

Houston…. It’s very stupid.

So I might be a little mean, but I’m going to use the quotes from the book to help me make my point.

Point 1: This book is drier than moon dust.

If you want to know how a scientist writes a book, look no further.

But come on…. Weir literally fell into the trap. Just because someone is an engineer does not mean they lack the imagination to pull off some colorful whimsy of showing not telling. Being good at math does not mean you can’t use your eyes to describe what the world looks like instead of shoving Artemis’s theoretical existence down reader’s throats. It’s grey, it’s hard living on the lunar surface, but what makes your story so different?

“A clumsy, awkward success is still a success.”

Not really Wier. Not really.

I need to include before I go further that I have not read The Martian. I really wish I had before jumping into this one. I feel then my point would have been better made. But…. I have seen the movie so I’m going to use that and some research that I did before writing this review.

In The Martian, a gentleman is left on Mars. So, to survive and not go crazy, this gentleman had some interesting internal conversations with himself. Cool. It works with the storyline. Something that a guy stranded alone would probably end up doing. The internal dialogue of a girl on a lunar space city…. doesn’t entirely work that well.

Essentially, Weir took the character from The Martian, placed him on the moon, and shoved him into a girls body. Yup, you heard me right….

Point 2: Guys cannot successfully write a female perspective.

“The city shined in the sunlight like a bunch of metallic boobs. What? I'm not a poet. They look like boobs.”

Case in point. Yes, this is Jazz everyone. A pre-teen boy. Oh, excuse me…. I mean a 26-year-old female living on the moon.

I appreciate that guys want to try a new perspective. Female writers do it to them all the time. But for some reason, when most guys attempt a female protagonist, they miss crucial wavelengths that allow their character to come across as female. I think it’s also very funny that Weir credits a bunch of female friends - this even includes his girlfriend - in helping him to achieve his success in capturing Jazz.

*Face. Palm. Groan.*

Weir, girls don’t obsess over sex like you’ve protrayed in the book.

On top of this very poorly executed decision, Weir also decided to be cool and make his protagonist not only female but also of Saudi Arabian descent. Salt on the wound. I get that we need more diverse characters in this world, something that more readers can connect to, but Weir, as a white male of the upper class, might not be the best one to deliver this. I’m going to take us back to the first thing I learned in writing class…. write what you know. And I’m pretty sure Weir doesn’t know either one of these things.

So Weir’s an author now. He’s made it big. The Martian took him far. He’s quit his job and can write full time. Sorry to say but I think it might have been a one trick pony.

Artemis is the story of one brave smuggler given the opportunity of a lifetime because all she wants more than anything in the world is to have her own private shower. So, in the middle of her grand payout, something goes terribly wrong, and what was just a job turns into a life-saving endeavor.

The story was very interesting. I like where he went with things, even if at times I struggled to follow him down the rabbit hole. Not everything he presented makes sense. Example… his need to put on repeat that the city could never leak oxygen. One and done man. That’s all we needed. At times, Jazz just seemed very unbelievable in her abilities. We get it, she’s smart, but if she’s smart enough to spend a few hours browsing electrical engineering schematics and become a master at it…. Ok, maybe you see what I’m trying to say. It just takes a lot of going along for the ride to fully get into the story.

I was originally going to give this 1 star. Seriously, that is how much I hated this book. The ending though boosted it up half a star. I was pleasantly surprised and did find myself turning the page pretty quickly. So if you can make it that far you will definitely be in for a nice surprise. Good luck though, I think you might need all your strength to stick it out. The only reason I did was because this was for book club.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge: 45/100

 

"Obsidio" by Amie Kaufman and Jay Kristoff Book Review

in

“Every story needs its hero. And its villain. And its monster.”

Are you the hero, the monster, or the villain??

What a way to end a series. All flash bangs and fireworks aside, this ending was about as near to perfect as you can make them. Another five stars. Not that you guys weren’t anticipating that.

Sorry, I’m not more of a mystery.

Obsidio starts where we’ve left - stuck between an endless void and an enemy bent on killing everyone. Question is, which way do you turn? Well, clearly not open space because that will get you nowhere but a quick death. So the crew turns back home, hoping that there will be something left to save.

And all told in the lovable dossier style that we’ve come to love. There are some new added elements, including a small comic style section that I personally loved. Also, a little more surveillance footage, which is a bummer, but hey, you can’t win them all.

“You believe there is always an alternative. Always a chance for a miracle. But I told you once before that miracles are statistical improbabilities. There is no such thing in real life.”

Obsidio (The Illuminae Files)
By Amie Kaufman, Jay Kristoff
Buy on Amazon

Side note *What is it about Aidan quotes that make them so good?*

If there are any questions about this series coming back, I think the ending answers that. A resounding ‘NO’. Sad though. I love these characters andI’m hoping that I might see them one day in film. Just sending that out into the universe now.

I love how you never really know what is going to happen in the end. Yes, we know a few characters who live. It’s all given away in the first two books, but the rest was left up for grabs. Since I’ve never read these authors before this series, I wasn’t really sure if they were going to be the happy ending kind or not. I’m not telling you which it is… you’re just going to have to read this series to find out. Guess what though, it all works out in the overall story.

My only negative would be on the new characters. No surprise, the first two books were based around two different love interests. If you expected something else… well, that sucks. I appreciate that Kristoff and Kaufman stuck with it, but the two new characters fell a little flat for me. I can’t be surprised. These two authors have pulled off numerous characters with excellent personalities. To make something entirely new again, well you had to give somewhere. Again, it could just be me.

I really don’t have more to say. I don’t want to go into extreme depth and give the story away. If you haven’t jumped in yet, what are you waiting for? This is the new series of our lifetime. Something I think the book community will be talking about for a while. Starting another countdown till their next series comes out. I think I only have a year right???? While I wait I can start venting on the book I just finished, which will happily be the next book review. Be prepared for that. Until then… happy reading.

Love Kait

Reading Challenge:

 

"Sky In The Deep" by Adrienne Young Book Review

There are some books that grab hold, wrap around your bones, seep into your core, and never let go.

“Breathe Fire.”

Sky In The Deep stole my heart. I’ve seen Young’s interviews on the book, I’ve heard her say the words, but nothing really prepares you for the emotions of family, love, and her father found on every page. Forget that... every word. I’m already trying to see if I can fit in a reread, not only because I’m not ready to leave the Viking clan, but also because I feel that I missed so much in the first read.

“And the glacier inside of me cracked. It roared as it broke and fell into the icy water around my heart.”

I was so skeptical picking up this book. The ARC reviews have been fifty fifty. But I’ve followed Young for a while on Instagram and wanted to give my full support. Something kept telling me this book would be good. Out I went in the first week and bought the darn thing and good thing I always listen to my gut.

Sky In The Deep is a story about a girl, simply put. Every five years, two clans, set to hate each other by the gods they worship, come to fight in hopes of gaining honor in the eyes of their gods to reach the sacred heaven in death. During the fighting, Eelyn sees her brother who died five years previous. In search of answers, Eelyn is captured only to discover that the world she knows is about to change.

True to form, I had no idea what to expect from this book. I knew it had Vikings, it was about family and love, but I never read the synopsis. I had no idea what to expect. That left for a great ride. The beginning starts out so strong, throwing you right in the battle, hearing and feeling every slash and thrust of the blades. Young does an excellent job portraying these scenes. I’ve said it before, writers can lose their readers in battle scenes, but Young holds you close really getting you into the moment.

What I love is the subtleness that Young uses in her writing. It’s not that she hides what’s going to happen, there’s you’re typical foreshadowing, but she slides it in not blaring loudly in your face. When it finally plays out - and yes she did go there - you don’t feel it’s just another overdone ploy. Instead, everything is natural.

On top of that, even with her moodiness, anger and sullen teenager ways, you have to love Eelyn. She’s a fierce warrior and I think in my top fictional characters list.

I do have a negative comment. I really wish I didn’t but I can’t lead you astray without giving a warning. Sometimes Young’s writing can be a little disjointed. Many times Young lost me in the story. I would be at point A, but then, out of nowhere, the character would be at point B. It was almost as if I missed an entire paragraph. It could have just been me, but it happened too many times not to mention it.

Ugh.I’m putting this book down feeling lost and broken and wanting more. I’m glad this isn’t a series - I feel like I’ve jumped into too many to keep them straight - but I really don’t want to say goodbye to Eelyn or Iri or Fiske. At least her next book is in the same world, supposedly a companion novel. I’m really curious who’s going to be in it. Now, I just need to wait a year. There’s always the title reveal to get excited about. Till then I’m sending all my willpower to urge Young to write faster. Either that or I’ll find a way to bug her on Instagram.

Love Kait.

Reading Challange: 39/100